EP 03 · Series Benchmark
She Still Has the Notebook
The professional caregiver who chose deliberately — and had to decide again.
Duration~07 minutes
FormatNarrative Monologue
HostAnand Chaturvedi®
SeriesWhat We Never Plan

The caregiver who chose deliberately.

Episode 03 of What We Never Plan is the series benchmark. It follows a professional caregiver who did not fall into care work — she chose it, deliberately, at twenty-three, when she had other options. In her first week on a care ward, she sits with a former structural engineer who has not had a proper conversation in six days. He talks for forty minutes about a bridge he helped design in 1978. That evening, she writes in a notebook: 'Today I understood why I am here.'

By year two, she has been promoted and is considering leaving — not because residents matter less, but because promotion in care means more administrative responsibility, not more care. Timing her documentation burden at 90 minutes on a good shift, three hours on a complex one, she opens the notebook to write a question: 'Is the job the documentation? Or is the documentation the evidence that I did the job?'

When she applies for a role outside healthcare, she describes her grief as a skill set. She reads it back. She recognises what she has been carrying. A colleague ten years older delivers the episode's wisdom: 'You cannot protect the shift. You can only protect the moments inside it.' Seven years later, she is still there. She still has the notebook.

Five findings.

By the end of this episode.

The sharpest two minutes.

The moment she reads back what she wrote — and recognises what she has been carrying.

Read the episode.

Transcript · ~16 minutes · What We Never Plan, EP03

She didn't fall into it. I want to start there, because I think it matters.

Most people assume that care work is something you end up in — a path chosen when other paths seemed closed, a practical decision, a job that was there when you needed one. And for some people, that's true. But not for her. She chose care work deliberately, at twenty-three years old, when she had other options. She turned down a graduate trainee position at a logistics firm to take a job on a care ward. And she knew, when she made the choice, that people would question it.

She chose it anyway.

In her first week, she was assigned to sit with a resident named Douglas. Douglas was eighty-four years old. He had been a structural engineer. He had not had a proper, sustained conversation in six days — his family was abroad, the staff were busy, the ward was understaffed the way wards are always understaffed. She sat with him for forty minutes. He talked about a bridge he had helped design in 1978. A bridge in a city she had never visited, over a river she had never crossed. He described the load-bearing calculations, the materials debate, the six months of site delays. He described the day it opened. His voice changed when he described the day it opened.

That evening, she went home and opened a notebook. She wrote: Today I understood why I am here.

By year two, she had been promoted. And she was considering leaving.

Not because the work mattered less. Not because the residents mattered less. But because what promotion meant in care — what it almost always means — is that you move away from the direct care relationship and toward the administrative layer that sits above it. More forms. More audits. More compliance. More of the documentation that, she was learning, consumed between ninety minutes and three hours of every eight-hour shift.

She began timing it. On a good day — a straightforward shift, no complex incidents, no new admissions — the documentation took ninety minutes. On a complex day, it took three hours. Three hours out of eight. And that wasn't counting the evenings she completed it at home, after dinner, when the shift was officially over. Pajama time, her colleagues called it. Everyone knew the phrase. Nobody had decided to end it.

She opened the notebook again. This time, she wrote a question.

The question was: Is the job the documentation? Or is the documentation the evidence that I did the job?

She applied for a role outside healthcare. She was good at her job — genuinely good — and the skills transferred. On her application form, under the heading that asked her to describe her relevant experience, she wrote about managing complex human situations under pressure, about the ability to hold a person's dignity and their distress at the same time, about working within systems that consistently asked more than they gave.

And then she read it back.

She was describing her grief as a skill set. That's what she had done. She had taken the hardest parts of seven years in care, and she had translated them into transferable competencies, and she had typed them neatly into a box. And reading them back, she could see — for the first time with that clarity — exactly what she had been carrying. For how long. Without naming it.

She didn't send the application.

There is a colleague she has, a woman ten years her senior who has watched three generations of caregivers arrive and leave and arrive again. When she described what had happened — the application, the reading back, the not sending — her colleague listened. And then she said something that I think is the most useful thing anyone has ever said about staying in care work.

She said: "You cannot protect the shift. You can only protect the moments inside it."

You cannot protect the shift. The system is what it is. The documentation is what it is. The understaffing is what it is. You cannot fix those things by staying, and you cannot fix them by leaving. But inside the shift — in the specific, unreachable, unauditable space between you and the person you are caring for — those moments are yours. The system cannot enter there. The form cannot capture what happened there. That space is what you protect. And you cannot protect it from the outside.

Seven years later, she is still there. She has watched the documentation burden increase. She has watched colleagues leave. She has held people through their last weeks, their last days, their last hours. She has gone home at the end of shifts that would have made most people reconsider everything. And she has come back the next day.

She still has the notebook. She hasn't written in it since year two. She keeps it in the drawer by her bed. I asked her why she keeps it, if she doesn't write in it. She said she doesn't know exactly. That it reminds her of something. That some things you just keep.

Some things, you keep.

If you work in care, if you chose this work and have found yourself questioning that choice — not because the people stopped mattering but because the system started taking more than it gave — this episode was for you. The moments inside the shift are real. They are the whole point. You are not alone in this.

Common questions.

Why do professional caregivers with options leave the profession — and what makes some stay?
The caregivers most likely to leave are often those who chose care deliberately when they had alternatives — the most motivated workers are most vulnerable to the system's costs. What makes some stay is not systemic improvement: it is the quality of specific moments within individual shifts. The decision to stay is rarely about the job overall; it is about protecting the moments the system cannot reach.
How much of a care worker's shift is spent on documentation rather than direct care?
Research consistently finds that documentation occupies between 90 minutes and three hours of an eight-hour care shift. In complex situations, the burden rises further. A significant proportion of care workers also complete documentation at home outside shift hours — a condition known as 'pajama time' — meaning the administrative burden extends beyond the working day.
What is the paradox of promotion in care work?
Promotion in professional care consistently means more administrative responsibility, not more direct care time. The most skilled and dedicated care workers — those most committed to the direct care relationship — are rewarded by being moved away from it. This is a structural paradox that accelerates departure from the profession among the workers most capable of leading it.
What is 'pajama time' and how widespread is it in care?
'Pajama time' refers to the practice of completing clinical or care documentation at home, outside working hours, typically in the evening — hence the name. It is documented across care and healthcare settings globally. Studies indicate that a significant minority of care workers spend additional unpaid hours managing administrative tasks that could not be completed during their shift.
How do the caregivers who stay manage to remain in a system that asks too much?
They do not protect the shift. They protect the moments inside it. The decision to stay is not made at the level of the system — it is made at the level of a specific conversation, a specific resident, a specific hour in a specific room. The caregivers who stay have identified what the system cannot reach, and they go there deliberately, within whatever space the shift allows.
What We Never Plan · Episode 03 of 6
If this sounded familiar —
you are not alone in this.

Episode 04 moves into the sandwich generation — the particular exhaustion of caring for a parent while raising a child, and the guilt that moves in four directions at once.

Global Headquarters
Corniche Road 1, Metio Building
1066 Épalinges, VD, Switzerland
Connect
Inquiries
press@anandchaturvedi.com
Speaking · Research · Media · Advisory