Caring Productivity vs. Helathcare Productivity:
Subtle Differences with Profound Implications for Long-Term Care
In the realm of long-term care, particularly in home and community-based settings, the distinction between “caring productivity” and “healthcare productivity” may seem subtle at first glance. However, this nuanced difference carries profound implications for the quality of care, patient outcomes, caregiver well-being, and the overall effectiveness of long-term support and services (LTSS). This monograph explores these concepts in depth, examining their definitions, applications, and impacts on the long-term care landscape.
Defining the Terms
Healthcare productivity typically refers to the efficiency and output of healthcare services, often measured through quantitative metrics such as patient volume, billable hours, or revenue generated. It focuses on measurable outcomes and efficiency in delivering healthcare services (McKinsey & Company, 2019). In contrast, caring productivity emphasizes the quality and impact of interpersonal care, focusing on the human aspects of healthcare such as empathy, attention, and relationship-building (Bowman, 2023).
The Importance of Distinction in Long-Term Care
In the context of LTSS delivered in home and community-based settings, the concept of caring productivity aligns more closely with the goals and nature of these services. As noted by the National Institute on Aging (2021), most home-based care services involve personal care – help with everyday activities, also called “activities of daily living.” These activities include bathing, dressing, eating, and taking medications, as well as supervision to ensure a person’s safety.
The emphasis on interpersonal relationships and quality of care in caring productivity is particularly relevant in these settings. For example, consider a home health aide assisting an elderly client with dementia. Under a care productivity model, success might be measured by the number of tasks completed in a given time frame. However, a caring productivity approach would also consider factors such as the aide’s ability to calm the client during moments of confusion, the development of trust between the aide and client, and the overall improvement in the client’s quality of life.
Research Supporting the Importance of Caring Productivity
A compelling body of evidence suggests that focusing on caring productivity can lead to better outcomes for both care recipients and caregivers. A study published in the Journal of Applied Gerontology found that when home care workers were able to form close relationships with their clients, both parties reported higher levels of satisfaction and well-being (Bjerregaard et al., 2015).
Moreover, a systematic review by Caspar et al. (2020) in the Gerontologist highlighted that person-centered care approaches, which align closely with the concept of caring productivity, were associated with improved quality of life for residents in long-term care facilities. The authors noted, “Person-centered care is not just about completing tasks; it’s about recognizing the individuality of each resident and tailoring care to their unique needs and preferences.”
Practical Implications
The distinction between healthcare productivity and caring productivity has tangible implications for how LTSS are delivered and evaluated. For instance, consider two different approaches to measuring the success of a home care program:
1. Healthcare Productivity Approach: Measures success by the number of clients served per day, the speed of service delivery, and the cost-effectiveness of care.
2. Caring Productivity Approach: Evaluates success based on client satisfaction, improvements in clients’ functional abilities, reduction in hospitalizations, and the strength of relationships between caregivers and clients.
While both approaches have merit, the caring productivity model is more likely to capture the nuanced aspects of care that contribute to long-term well-being and quality of life for LTSS recipients.
Impact on Caregiver Well-being
The focus on caring productivity also has significant implications for caregiver well-being. A study published in the Journal of Applied Gerontology found that caregivers who felt they were able to provide high-quality, person-centered care reported higher job satisfaction and lower levels of burnout (Squires et al., 2015). This suggests that emphasizing caring productivity could potentially address some of the workforce challenges in the long-term care sector, such as high turnover rates.
Dr. Robyn Stone, Senior Vice President of Research at LeadingAge, notes, “When we allow caregivers the time and resources to form meaningful relationships with clients, we’re not just improving care quality – we’re also investing in our workforce. Caregivers who feel valued and see the positive impact of their work are more likely to stay in their jobs and continue providing high-quality care” (Stone, 2020).
Challenges in Implementation
While the benefits of focusing on caring productivity are clear, implementing this approach is not without challenges. One significant hurdle is the difficulty in measuring and quantifying the qualitative aspects of care that are central to caring productivity. Traditional metrics used in healthcare, such as time spent on tasks or number of procedures performed, don’t capture the full value of empathetic, person-centered care.
Additionally, there may be concerns about the cost-effectiveness of a caring productivity approach. Allowing more time for relationship-building and personalized care might seem less efficient from a purely financial perspective. However, research suggests that this approach can lead to cost savings in the long run. A study published in Health Affairs found that person-centered care models in nursing homes were associated with lower hospitalization rates and overall healthcare costs (Grabowski et al., 2016).
Balancing Care and Caring Productivity
It’s important to note that healthcare productivity and caring productivity are not mutually exclusive. In fact, the most effective LTSS programs likely strike a balance between the two. As Dr. Mary Jane Koren, a geriatrician and quality improvement expert, explains, “We need to be efficient in our care delivery, but not at the expense of the human touch. The challenge is finding ways to measure and incentivize both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of care” (Koren, 2018).
One potential approach is the use of mixed-methods evaluation that combines traditional quantitative metrics with qualitative assessments of care quality and relationship strength. For example, the Home Care Satisfaction Measure (HCSM) developed by researchers at the University of Minnesota incorporates both objective measures of care delivery and subjective assessments of client satisfaction and quality of life (Shippee et al., 2015).
Policy Implications
The distinction between healthcare productivity and caring productivity has important implications for policy and regulation in the LTSS sector. Current quality measures and reimbursement models often prioritize easily quantifiable aspects of care, which may inadvertently incentivize a focus on care productivity at the expense of caring productivity.
Policy makers and regulators should consider ways to incorporate measures of caring productivity into quality assessment and reimbursement models. This could include:
1. Developing and validating new quality measures that capture aspects of caring productivity, such as person-centeredness and relationship quality.
2. Incorporating patient and caregiver reported outcomes into quality assessment frameworks.
3. Exploring value-based payment models that reward providers for improvements in patient quality of life and satisfaction, not just clinical outcomes.
4. Providing funding for training programs that help caregivers develop the interpersonal skills necessary for high-quality, person-centered care.
Conclusion
In the context of long-term care delivered in home and community-based settings, the subtle distinction between healthcare productivity and caring productivity has profound implications. While healthcare productivity focuses on efficiency and quantifiable outputs, caring productivity emphasizes the quality of interpersonal care and its impact on both care recipients and caregivers.
The evidence suggests that prioritizing caring productivity can lead to improved outcomes for care recipients, increased job satisfaction for caregivers, and potentially even cost savings in the long run. However, implementing this approach requires overcoming challenges in measurement and potentially rethinking traditional approaches to care delivery and evaluation.
As we move forward, it’s crucial that policy makers, healthcare providers, and researchers work together to develop systems that value and promote caring productivity. By doing so, we can create a long-term care system that not only meets the physical needs of care recipients but also enhances their quality of life and preserves their dignity.
In the words of Dr. Atul Gawande, renowned surgeon and author, “We’ve been wrong about what our job is in medicine. We think our job is to ensure health and survival. But really it is larger than that. It is to enable well-being” (Gawande, 2014). This sentiment encapsulates the essence of caring productivity and underscores its importance in the future of long-term care.
References:
Bjerregaard, K., Haslam, S. A., Mewse, A., & Morton, T. (2015). The shared experience of caring: A study of care-workers’ motivations and identifications at work. Ageing and Society, 35(10), 2220-2241.
Bowman, R. (2023). Banning Productivity: Being Destroyed By Design. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/banning-productivity-being-destroyed-design-robert-bowman
Caspar, S., Cooke, H. A., Phinney, A., & Ratner, P. A. (2020). Practice change interventions in long-term care facilities: What works, and why? Canadian Journal on Aging, 39(2), 254-280.
Gawande, A. (2014). Being mortal: Medicine and what matters in the end. Metropolitan Books.
Grabowski, D. C., O’Malley, A. J., Afendulis, C. C., Caudry, D. J., Elliot, A., & Zimmerman, S. (2016). Culture change and nursing home quality of care. The Gerontologist, 56(Suppl_1), S40-S50.
Koren, M. J. (2018). Person-centered care for nursing home residents: The culture-change movement. Health Affairs, 29(2), 312-317.
McKinsey & Company. (2019). The productivity imperative for healthcare delivery in the United States. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare/our-insights/the-productivity-imperative-for-healthcare-delivery-in-the-united-states
National Institute on Aging. (2021). What Is Long-Term Care? https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/what-long-term-care
Shippee, T. P., Henning-Smith, C., Kane, R. L., & Lewis, T. (2015). Resident- and facility-level predictors of quality of life in long-term care. The Gerontologist, 55(4), 643-655.
Squires, J. E., Hoben, M., Linklater, S., Carleton, H. L., Graham, N., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2015). Job satisfaction among care aides in residential long-term care: A systematic review of contributing factors, both individual and organizational. Nursing Research and Practice, 2015, 157924.
Stone, R. I. (2020). The direct care workforce: Raising the floor of job quality. Generations, 44(3), 38-44.
Citations:
[1] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/banning-productivity-being-destroyed-design-robert-bowman
[2] https://www.ukg.com/blog/workforce-management/how-prioritize-both-nursing-productivity-and-patient-care
[3] https://myhomecare.ie/career-advice/the-importance-of-professional-development-for-homecare-workers/
[4] https://nurseio.com/skilled-nursing-facilities-improve-productivity/
[5] https://www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/model/control-costs/benefits/productivity.html
[6] https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/care-purpose-and-productivity-crisis
[7] https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertglatter/2012/05/30/how-should-we-define-productivity-in-healthcare/
[8] https://www.pathstonepartners.com/how-to-measure-productivity-in-healthcare/
[9] https://www.caringfortheages.com/interdisciplinaryteams
[10] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264609/
[11] https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare/our-insights/the-productivity-imperative-for-healthcare-delivery-in-the-united-states
[12] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK396398/
[13] https://www.reddit.com/r/cna/comments/17aqcdd/in_long_term_care_do_facilities_care_more_about/
[14] https://www.coremedicalgroup.com/blog/productivity-requirements-patient-driven-payment-model
[15] https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/long-term-care/what-long-term-care
[16] https://collectivehealth.com/blog/benefits-shop-talk/health-benefits-support-productivity-performance/
[17] https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/healthcare%20systems%20and%20services/our%20insights/health%20care%20productivity/mgi_health_care_productivity.pdf
[18] https://www.asha.org/slp/productivity/
[19] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK584660/